As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to integrate into core business operations—from financial forecasting and fraud detection to medical diagnostics and legal analysis—organizations face a critical need to assess and secure these systems against a new class of threats. Traditional cybersecurity frameworks are not designed to handle the risks associated with AI, which include model-specific vulnerabilities, data dependency issues, and attack vectors that exploit probabilistic outputs.
In 2025, security experts are seeing a significant rise in attacks targeting AI systems, such as:
- Prompt Injection Attacks that override large language model instructions.
- Model Inversion, enabling the extraction of sensitive training data.
- Adversarial Inputs that manipulate predictions through small, undetectable changes.
- Data Poisoning, which corrupts the integrity of training datasets.
These developments underscore the need for formal, structured AI security reviews—security assessments that go beyond traditional application testing to evaluate the full lifecycle and threat profile of AI systems.
The Case for AI Security Reviews
Unlike conventional applications, AI models are dynamic, continuously evolving, and highly dependent on data inputs and training pipelines. They also often rely on third-party frameworks and open-source model components, which increase the risk of supply chain vulnerabilities. The opaque nature of many AI systems (“black box” models) further complicates security efforts.
AI security reviews are essential to identifying not only obvious flaws in system design, but also subtle and emerging threats that may be invisible in typical codebase audits or infrastructure scans.
A Framework for Conducting AI Security Reviews
1. Define the Scope of the AI System Begin by establishing clear boundaries and dependencies:
- Model type (e.g., natural language processing, computer vision, time series forecasting).
- Data sensitivity and sources (e.g., proprietary, financial, healthcare).
- Deployment architecture (e.g., on-premise, cloud-hosted, API-connected).
- Third-party model usage or fine-tuning status.
This baseline assessment helps security teams determine risk exposure and compliance obligations.
2. Conduct Threat Modeling with AI Context Apply and extend traditional frameworks (like STRIDE) to account for AI-specific threats:
- Spoofing: Malicious actors impersonating trusted data sources.
- Tampering: Manipulation of training data or model parameters.
- Information Disclosure: Inference of sensitive training data through output queries.
- Denial of Service: Overloading model endpoints with adversarial or malformed input.
Security teams should utilize threat modeling tools adapted for AI, including:
- Microsoft Counterfit for automated red teaming.
- IBM’s Adversarial Robustness Toolbox for testing AI resilience.
- Google’s Model Card Toolkit for responsible AI documentation.
3. Secure Data Pipelines Ensure the integrity and confidentiality of data at every stage:
- Implement strict input validation and data cleaning protocols.
- Track data lineage and transformations throughout the model lifecycle.
- Isolate training environments from production systems.
- Monitor for data drift or anomalies post-deployment.
Any compromise in data quality or provenance can degrade model performance and introduce security gaps.
4. Test Against Adversarial Attacks Simulate both insider and outsider threats using real-world attack scenarios:
- Evaluate system behavior against adversarial inputs designed to cause misclassification or misuse.
- Test for model extraction risks through API querying patterns.
- Conduct prompt injection trials in systems leveraging large language models.
This type of adversarial testing helps identify behavioral vulnerabilities that would otherwise remain undetected.
5. Integrate AI Security into the Development Lifecycle Security must be embedded into the AI system’s software development and deployment pipeline:
- Implement code reviews and static analysis tools on model-related scripts and libraries.
- Use continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) practices that include security gates for AI updates.
- Define clear ownership between data scientists, ML engineers, and cybersecurity teams.
This integration ensures that AI models are not deployed or updated without appropriate review and testing.
6. Monitor and Audit AI System Behavior Operational monitoring must account for both usage and outcomes:
- Record model input and output logs, with safeguards for privacy.
- Maintain detailed version histories of models, datasets, and parameters.
- Establish anomaly detection for unusual access patterns or performance shifts.
- Audit all access and retraining events to support compliance investigations.
AI observability tools and telemetry systems can provide the visibility needed to maintain accountability.
7. Document AI Behavior and Risk Effective documentation is critical for both transparency and regulation. This includes:
- Model Cards: Summarize model intent, architecture, training data, limitations, and known biases.
- System Cards: Map out interconnected AI components, data flow, and usage boundaries.
- Risk Assessments: Evaluate business, legal, and reputational risks related to model usage.
As regulatory bodies worldwide move toward mandatory AI disclosures (including the EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF), comprehensive documentation will be necessary to demonstrate due diligence.
Case Study: AI Security Review in Financial Services
A leading European investment bank integrated a proprietary language model to support internal legal document analysis. During an AI security review, red-teaming exercises revealed that certain prompt injection techniques could override system restrictions and extract compliance-sensitive logic.
In response, the organization:
- Segmented user roles and implemented output filtering.
- Locked core system prompts with restricted token contexts.
- Instituted a quarterly AI security review cycle.
The proactive review allowed the bank to resolve a significant risk without regulatory fallout or operational disruption.
Final Considerations
Organizations must treat AI security not as a one-off exercise, but as a continuous process woven into the broader enterprise risk and governance framework. As the capabilities of AI models evolve, so too will the methods used to exploit them.
A mature AI security review process should include:
- Initial threat modeling before deployment.
- Ongoing adversarial testing in pre-production.
- Real-time monitoring and alerting post-deployment.
- Structured documentation for regulators and auditors.
- Cross-functional oversight between security, compliance, and data teams.
Securing AI is not just a technical issue—it’s a strategic imperative. The organizations that prioritize AI safety today will be the ones best positioned to innovate with confidence tomorrow.
Resources for Further Reading
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework (2024): https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
- Microsoft Counterfit Toolkit: https://github.com/Azure/counterfit
- Google Model Card Toolkit: https://github.com/tensorflow/model-card-toolkit
- ENISA Guidelines on AI Cybersecurity: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/securing-algorithms
#AIsecurity #CyberRisk #ModelGovernance #SecureAI #Infosec #EnterpriseAI #ICCSOCyberThreatWeekly #ICCSO